Can An Entire System Become Stupid?

Applying Carlo Cipolla's Laws of Human Stupidity to Modern Education Systems

Cipolla’s Matrix of Human Behavior

Carlo M. Cipolla's theory of human stupidity is a thought-provoking and somewhat humorous framework first outlined in his essay The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity. In the essay, Cipolla, an economic historian, classified human actions into four categories based on whether they benefit or harm the actor and others:

1. Intelligent: Actions that benefit both the actor and others.

2. Helpless: Actions that harm the actor but benefit others.

3. Bandit: Actions that benefit the actor but harm others.

4. Stupid: Actions that harm both the actor and others.

Based on his definition of the “stupid” category of human action, Cipolla formulated "laws" to describe how stupidity manifests and affects society:

1. Everyone underestimates the number of stupid people in the world.

2. The probability that a person is stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.

3. A stupid person is someone who causes harm to another person or group while deriving no benefit themselves and possibly even incurring harm.

   • Cipolla repeatedly emphasizes this as the core of his theory: stupid actions result in a net loss for everyone involved.

4. Non-stupid people always underestimate the destructive power of stupid people.

5. A stupid person is the most dangerous type of person.

Cipolla argues that for a society to flourish, it must minimize the influence of stupid people and maximize the impact of intelligent actions. But what if we applied Cipolla’s argument to entire systems, organizations, or even nations?

Can An Entire Organization Become Stupid?

An entire organization can absolutely exhibit characteristics that align with Cipolla's definition of stupidity, particularly if its overall behavior consistently results in zero-sum or even negative-sum outcomes. In such cases, the organization operates in a way that harms itself, its members, and its stakeholders without producing any net benefit, effectively functioning as a "stupid" entity.

Given the focus of this series is on education, below are presented some key areas of stupidity in the American K-12 system:

Overemphasis on Standardized Testing

• Stupidity Classification: Actions that harm students (stress, lack of critical thinking skills) and teachers (burnout, demotivation) while benefiting neither.

• Example: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) tied school funding and teacher evaluations to standardized test scores. This led to:

  • Teaching to the test, narrowing curricula to math and reading while neglecting arts, sciences, and social studies.

  • Schools focusing more on test preparation than fostering creativity, critical thinking, or problem-solving skills.

  • Cheating scandals (e.g., Atlanta Public Schools in 2009), which highlighted how harmful incentives can lead to unethical practices.

  • Net Outcome: A generation of students less prepared for real-world challenges and a teaching profession that feels undervalued and constrained.

Administrative Bloat

• Stupidity Classification: Excessive growth in school district administrative staff drains resources from classrooms while creating inefficiencies.

• Example: Between 1950 and 2015, the number of administrators in U.S. schools increased by over 700%, compared to a 96% increase in student enrollment.

  • Consequences include:

    • Fewer resources allocated to teachers and students.

    • Complex bureaucracies that slow decision-making and innovation.

  • Net Outcome: A system that prioritizes compliance and paperwork over student outcomes, creating inefficiencies that harm everyone.

Neglect of Diverse Learning Needs

• Stupidity Classification: Implementing "one-size-fits-all" policies harms students with different learning styles, needs, and abilities without yielding better outcomes.

• Example: Many schools struggle to support students with special needs, gifted students, or those from non-English-speaking households due to insufficient funding and rigid curricula.

  • Net Outcome: Students who are marginalized or left behind, reducing their ability to thrive and flourish.

These are a few generic areas of stupidity found in the current American K-12 system, but let’s examine a particular case study: the widespread adoption in the English-speaking world of the now largely discredited whole-word or whole-language approach to reading instruction.

Applying Cipolla’s Theory of Stupidity: The Failed Whole-Language Reading Approach

“I don’t know why education and in particular reading, within the field of education, has been so wimpy with respect to building on evidence rather than on heart … The way we went down the road to whole language is really a story of stupidity.”

-Dr. G. Reid Lyon, former Chief of the Child Development and Behavior Branch within the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development at the National Institute of Health – Converging Evidence – Reading Research What It Takes To Read

The whole-word or whole-language approach to reading instruction encouraged students to use cues like pictures, sentence structure, and prior knowledge to predict words rather than relying on phonics to decode them. Despite evidence that systematic phonics instruction is far more effective, the whole-word approach was widely adopted throughout the English-speaking world in the 1990s and continues to be highly influential in education training and practice.

1. The Stupid Decision

According to Cipolla’s Third Law:

A stupid person is someone who causes harm to others while deriving no benefit themselves, and possibly even suffering harm.

Adopting and persisting with the whole-word method fits this definition:

• Harm to Students:
  Students taught using whole-word methods often struggle with reading fluency, comprehension, and long-term literacy skills.

• Harm to Teachers:
  Teachers face frustration as they watch students fail to grasp reading fundamentals, often requiring later interventions that could have been avoided with phonics.

• Harm to Society:
  Poor literacy skills result in reduced employability, higher dropout rates, and economic inequality, leading to broader societal costs.

• No Clear Benefits:
  Proponents of whole-word methods failed to demonstrate lasting advantages, yet the method persisted for decades due to ideological adherence and institutional inertia.

2. How Did Stupidity Persist?

The Second Law:

The probability that a person is stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.

This principle explains how even highly educated policymakers, administrators, and educational theorists supported and promoted the whole-word method despite mounting evidence against it. Their decisions were often driven by:

1. Appeal to Modernity:
   Whole-word methods were marketed as progressive, making critics seem outdated or resistant to innovation.

2. Confirmation Bias:
   Advocates ignored evidence supporting phonics, instead favoring anecdotal successes or poorly designed studies.

3. Institutional Momentum:
   Textbook publishers, teacher training programs, and bureaucracies doubled down on whole-word approaches to justify earlier investments.

3. Who Benefited? (Bandit Behavior)

Cipolla’s Bandits harm others while benefiting themselves. Certain groups exploited the whole-word method to their advantage:

• Publishers profited by selling new curricula, textbooks, and supplementary materials promoting whole-word techniques.

• Consultants and Trainers built careers offering professional development sessions to teach ineffective methods.

• Administrators advanced their careers by aligning with what was perceived as cutting-edge pedagogy despite the evidence.

While they gained in the short term, the broader costs to education and literacy reveal the stupid behavior underlying this trend.

4. Lessons from Cipolla’s Fourth Law:

Non-stupid people always underestimate the destructive power of stupid people.

The damage caused by whole-word methods may have persisted for decades because critics underestimated the institutional inertia and emotional commitment to the methodology. The persistence of the whole-word reading methodology mirrors Cipolla’s theory of stupidity, as it likely caused widespread harm without clear benefits. It demonstrates how educational systems can fall victim to irrational trends, institutional inertia, and misplaced priorities.

Conclusion

If a stupid person is the most dangerous of all, as per Cipolla’s 5th rule, then it follows that a stupid system is even more destructive. Unlike individuals, these systems have the resources and authority to perpetuate dysfunction on a larger scale. Recognizing stupidity at all levels—personal, organizational, and systemic—is the first step towards minimizing the influence of these stupid entities on our lives.

Increasingly, parents are recognizing that traditional K-12 educational systems have become “stupid.” In response, many are taking steps to reduce the influence of modern compulsory education on their children’s lives while seeking smarter, more effective alternatives that align with intelligent systems and promote better educational outcomes. In the next part of this series, we will take a closer look at some of these educational alternatives in greater depth.

---

Sources for further reading:

The Basic Laws of Human Stupidity, Carlo M. Cipolla

Sold a Story: How Teaching Kids to Read Went So Wrong

Systematic Phonics Instruction Helps Students Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's Meta-Analysis

Ending the Reading Wars: Reading Acquisition From Novice to Expert

Whole Language! What was that all about?